Patna High CourtCR. WJC/946/2016withdrawn

Ranjit Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-22The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.946 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Ranjit Singh, son of Sri Bhuvneshwar Singh resident of VillageNavanagar Nizamat, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur.

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur.

5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, District- Muzaffarpur.

6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur West at Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.

7. The Officer Incharge, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

8. Sri Vishwanath Prasad Rai, the Investigating Officer, P.S. Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

9. Sonu Kumar son of Raj Kumar Rai resident of Village- Navanagar Nizamat, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

10. Sri Raj Kumar Rai son of Ramchandra Rai resident of VillageNavanagar Nizamat, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar Chaubey, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma, AAG-3. Mr. Anand Kumar, AC to AAG-3.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 22-09-2016 Heard Mr. Upendra Kumar Chaubey, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. After some argument, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.946 of 2016 (2) dt.22-09-2016 2/2 future, if so advised, and also take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) K.C.jha/- U T