← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56003/2017dismissed

Ramashray Prasad v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-12-06Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56003 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -117 Year- 2016 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Ramashray Prasad S/o Late Badri Prasad Yadav, Resident of VillageTetua Bazar, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Nigrani Anwenshan Bureau (Vigilance Department), Bihar, Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected twice by orders dated 22-02-2017 & 10-05-2017 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 3756 of 2017 and 21773 of 2017 respectively.

A report was called for from the court below, which has been received.

From the report of trial court, it appears that the trial of the petitioner has already begun and 2 witnesses have been examined. The trial court has stated in the report that at least one year time will be required for conclusion of trial.

This court directs the trial court to conclude the trial of the petitioner within 9 months from the date of receipt/production of copy of order giving short adjournments to the parties. The court below will issue necessary letter in advance to the Superintendent of Police, Patna

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56003 of 2017 (3) dt.06-12-2017 for production of remaining witnesses for their examination. Prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with C.B.I. Case No. 117 of 2016 is rejected for the present. The petitioner is however given liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the court below itself in the event the trial is not concluded within nine months and in that event, the court below will give reason in the order for not concluding the trial within the aforesaid period of nine months.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T