Patna High CourtCWJC/5059/2016disposed

Baban Chaudhary And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-19Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5059 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Baban Chaudhary, son of Late Ramashish Chaudhary

2. Yogendra Chaudhary, son of Late Mohan Chaudhary

3. Shiv Jee Singh, son of Late Baleshwar Singh

4. Raghunath Chaudhary, son of Late Shiv Prasad

5. Hare Ram Chaudhary, son of Late Barhmdeo Chaudhary

6. Satyendra Singh, son of Late Kundan Singh

7. Anjay Chaudhary son of Late Shidhnath Chaudhary

8. Kameshwar Chaudhary, son of Late Ram Raj Chaudhary

9. Saryu Singh, son of Late Baleshwar Singh All residents of Village and Post- Amsari, Anchal- Chaugai, P.S. Murar, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Buxar.

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dumraon, District- Buxar.

5. The Circle Officer, Chougain, District- Buxar. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Smt. Nivedita Nirvikar, GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-09-2016 Heard Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, and Smt. Nivedita Nirvikar, learned Government Advocate No.7, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.

In view of the fact that according to the counter affidavit, filed by the State Government, the encroachment from

Patna High Court CWJC No.5059 of 2016 (2) dt.19-09-2016 2/2 the land, in question, which forms the subject-matter of this Public Interest Litigation, has already been removed, the proceedings of this Public Interest Litigation is closed with liberty given to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) K.C.jha/- U