← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14014/2018disposed

Kanchan Mala And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-28Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14014 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Kanchan Mala wife of Sri Hemant Kumar, Resident of Village - Pokhraira, P.O. Gidha, P.S. Saraiya, District - Muzaffarpur, presently Pramukh of Block Panchayat Samiti, Saraiya, District Muzaffarpur.

2. Suman Devi wife of Raj Kumar Rai, Resident of Village - Paigambarpur, P.S. Saraiya, District - Muzaffarpur, presently Up - Pramukh of Block Panchayat Samiti, Saraiya, District Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur.

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Muzaffarpur West, District - Muzaffarpur.

6. The Block Development Officer, Saraiya-cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Saraiya, Dist

7. Urmila Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

8. Vipin Mishra son of not known to the petitioners

9. Maheshwar Paswan son of not known to the petitioners

10. Jaheda Khatoon wife of not known to the petitioners

11. Balkeshi Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

12. Mayantri Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

13. Madhu Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

14. Savita Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

15. Rinku Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

16. Md. Aslam son of not known to the petitioners

17. Prabha Chaudhary wife of not known to the petitioners

18. Arjun Kumar Gupta son of not known to the petitioners

19. Akhilesh Kumar son of not known to the petitioners

20. Sunil Kumar son of not known to the petitioners

21. Jahan Ara wife of not known to the petitioners

22. Sabita Kumari @ Savitri Kumari wife of not known to the petitioners

23. Janardan Prasad Thakur son of not known to the petitioners

24. Rajan Kumar son of not known to the petitioners

25. Mukesh Kumar son of not known to the petitioners

26. Geeta Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

27. Sunil Kumar Dwivedi son of not known to the petitioners

28. Renu Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

29. Kaijar Khatoon wife of not known to the petitioners

30. Munni Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

31. Ganesh Kumar son of not known to the petitioners

32. Pramila Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

33. Anuradha Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

34. Umesh Sah son of not known to the petitioners

35. Jaga Paswan son of not known to the petitioners

36. Sabita Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

37. Jitendra Kumar son of not known to the petitioners

38. Suchita Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

Patna High Court CWJC No.14014 of 2018(5) dt.28-01-2019 2/3

39. Lalit Bhagat son of not known to the petitioners

40. Khemchandra Prasad son of not known to the petitioners

41. Chitra Rekha Devi wife of not known to the petitioners

42. Umesh Mahto son of not known to the petitioners

43. Anil Bhagat son of not known to the petitioners

44. Tarkeshwar Kumar Chaudhary son of not known to the petitioners

45. Ramesh Singh son of not known to the petitioners Respondent Nos. 7 to 45 are the members of Block Panchayat Samiti, Saraiya through the Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Saraiya, P.O. and P.S. Saraiya, District Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.S.B.K. Mangalam, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay- GA5 For the Res. No. 24 :

Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Res. Nos. 7 to 21,:

Mr. Suraj Nr. Yadav, Advocate 27, 25, 26, 30, 32, 36, 37, Mr. Upendra Kumar Chaubey, Advocate 38, 41, 44, 45 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-01-2019 Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, learned counsel representing the petitioners accepts the correctness of the preliminary objection raised by Mr. Ajay, learned counsel representing the State.

Learned counsel for the private respondents are also present.

In view of the subsequent developments which has not been brought on record and is not challenged, this writ application has become infructuous and can not proceed. The writ application is disposed off accordingly. It goes without saying that the subsequent developments which are not under challeng in the present writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.14014 of 2018(5) dt.28-01-2019 3/3 application, may be challenged by petitioner, if so advised in an appropriate proceeding.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/-vedU