Vichar Kumar @ Ram Vichar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44168 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2022 Thana- TARIYANI CHOWK District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1.
VICHAR KUMAR @ RAM VICHAR KUMAR SON OF SHAMBHU RAI @ SHAMBHU YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - FAJILPUR, P.S. - RAJEPUR, DISTRICT - EAST CHAMPARAN 2.
BALDEO RAM @ BALDEO RAI SON OF JOGEN @ JOGENDRA RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - FAJILPUR, P.S. - RAJEPUR, DISTRICT - EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR, PATNA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 21-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant by pouring acid upon her body.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44168 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 2/3 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioners are not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioners have come into light, on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Anand Kumar @ Anand Yadav and Ritesh Kumar @ Rikesh Kumar, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law and they have already been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 28.06.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17514 of 2023 and its analogous case. Petitioners have no concern with the alleged occurrence and there is no eye-witness of the alleged occurrence. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. They are languishing in judicial custody since 14.10.2022.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44168 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 3/3 Tariyani Chowk P.S. Case No. 155 of 2022.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T