← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/184/2021disposed

Ranjeet Kumar Sarraf @ Babloo v. The Bihar State Electricity Board,

2021-09-08Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO. 184 of 2021 ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar Sarraf @ Babloo, son of Prahlad Prasad Sarraf, resident of Gopal Ji Lane, Chhota Bazar, Muzaffarpur, P.S. Mushahari Town, District Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Electricity Boards, Patna.

2. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Boards, Patna.

3. The Director, North Bihar Public Distribution Company Ltd. (NBPDCL), Muzaffarpur.

4. The Superintending Engineer, Bihar State Electricity Boards, Muzaffarpur.

5. The Executive Engineer, Bihar State Electricity Boards, Muzaffarpur.

6. The Assistant Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Saraiyagan, Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC 3.

For the Electricity Board : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Adv.

Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 08-09-2021 The instant case has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the

prevailing situation on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.

The present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondent authorities to make necessary correction in the electricity bill dated 12.12.2019, issued in favor of Consumer No. 11820015705, which is in the name of the wife of petitioner, by which a bill of Rs. 19285/- has been raised. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to agitate the aforesaid disputes before the consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Muzaffarpur, which has been constituted under Section 42(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Ld. Senior Counsel appearing for the Respondents Company, Sri Vinay Kirti Singh, assisted by Shri Vijay Kumar Verma and Shri Akhileshwar Singh as also the learned counsel for the respondent State, Sri Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC3, have got no objection.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed, however with liberty to the petitioner to approach the consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Muzaffarpur for redressal of his aforesaid grievances and in case appropriate petition is filed within a period of four weeks from

today, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Muzaffarpur in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks, thereafter. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Tiwary/-