← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1185/2025disposed

Idmohamad Ali @ Idmohammad v. The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Bihar, Patna.

2025-06-24Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra,Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1185 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Idmohamad Ali @ Idmohammad Son of Md. Amrali Miyan @ Amarali Miyan @ Amar Ali Resident of village and P.O Kalyanpur, P S Bhore, District Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Collector cum District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj.

6.

The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Hathua, Gopalganj. 7.

The Station House Officer, Bhore Police Station, Gopalganj. 8.

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Choudhary Son of Shanker Yadav @ Shankar Choudhary Chaukidar, R/O village and P.O.- Kalyanpur, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Bhakta, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. A.A.G. 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI) 24-06-2025 Heard Mr. Suresh Prasad Bhakta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. AAG-13 appearing for the respondents.

2. Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with a view to file reply before the respondent authority pursuant to the show cause

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1185 of 2025(2) dt.24-06-2025 2/2 notice issued by the authority.

3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

4. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

5. It is clarified that we have not examined the merits of the case of the petitioner.

(Vipul M. Pancholi, J) (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) K.C.Jha/- U