Bibek Kumar @ Bikesh Paswan @ Bikash Kumar @ Bibek Paswan @ Bikash Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35708 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2025 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== Bibek Kumar @ Bikesh Paswan @ Bikash Kumar @ Bibek Paswan @ Bikash Paswan S/o Late Gadho Paswan Resident of Gachhi Tola, Rajendra Nagar, P.S, Town, Distt. Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Narshingh Tanti, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 20 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 15.01.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 117, 109, 352, 351)2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. According to prosecution case, the petitioner along with other accused persons assaulted the informant with various weapons.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that there is case and counter
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35708 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/3 case. He further submits that there is specific allegation against that he assaulted the informant by means of iron rod and although the informant received four injuries out of four injuries three injuries are simple in nature and one injury is grievous in nature, which was inflicted upon the hand of the informant, which is not a vital part of the body.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the informant and apart from that, the petitioner is named in the F.I.R and apart from that, the petitioner carries one criminal antecedent other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matter.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, the injury inflicted upon the injured person is simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 20
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35708 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 3/3 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and with other following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Jyoti Kumari/- U T