Lalu Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37952 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2022 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Lalu Prasad Yadav Son Of Ram Sobhit Rai R/O Village- Chakhabib, Ward No.-14, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 30-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case no. 48 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 354, 448, 307, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

AS per allegation in F.I.R., when the informant was sleeping in outer corridor, the petitioner along with other accused person came and tried to press the neck of informant with intention of kill her and gave digger blow. It is further alleged that they also threatened and snatched golden Jitiya and both ear rigs.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37952 of 2022(2) dt.30-11-2022 2/3 has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that there is a dispute between the informant and the accused persons with regard to money transaction which has taken by the informant due to which he has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the prosecution case is not in-consonance with the injury report, doctor opined that the injury sustained by hard and blunt substance while the informant was assaulted by means of knife and as per the impugned order there is no repetition of assaulting found against the petitioner.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case no. 48 of 2022, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37952 of 2022(2) dt.30-11-2022 3/3 Rosera, District- Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T