Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40323/2024bail granted

Ravindra Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-05Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40323 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2024 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ravindra Sah Son of Motichand Sah @ Matichand Sah Resident of village - Himmtapur, P.S.- Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 05-06-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case no. 30 of 2024 registered under sections 307, 341, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, nine named accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed. Over a dispute relating to agricultural land, it is stated that Balinder Shah assaulted the informant's husband with a lathi on his head while Golu Sah struck her son with a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40323 of 2024(2) dt.05-06-2024 2/3 knife and Satyendra Sah assaulted her with a lathi. It is further stated that the petitioner and one Laxman Sah struck the son of the informant, namely Vijay Sah with lathi causing injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Over a dispute relating to agricultural land there is case and counter case between the parties, the F.I.R of the counter case having been lodged by the petitioner which is Annexure-2 to the petition. Further referring to the injury report (Annexure- 5) it is submitted that the injury on the son of the informant, whom the petitioner is said to have assaulted has been found to be simple in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 5.3.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R, there being case and counter case between the parties, the injury on the son of the informant having been found to be simple in nature and the petitioner having remained in custody since 5.3.2024, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case no. 30 of 2024, on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40323 of 2024(2) dt.05-06-2024 3/3 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj. (Partha Sarthy, J) Harsh/- U T