Patna High CourtL.P.A/11/2017dismissed

Ajit Anand v. The Bihar Public Service Commission And ORS

2017-06-29The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.11 of 2017 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10869 of 2016 =========================================================== Ajit Anand, son of Bijay Kumar, resident of village Sri Nagar Hata, P.S. K. Hat, District Purnia, at present residing at BC 7F, DDA /Flats, Munirka, P.S. Vasant Vihar (New Delhi).

.... .... Petitioner-Appellant/s

Versus

1. The Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna through its Chairman.

2. The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Joint Secretary cum Examination Controller, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna.

.... .... Respondents- Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sandeep Shahi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore, Senior Advocate Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 29-06-2017 On account of the fact that as per the condition stipulated in the advertisement, the petitioner was unable to produce the original certificates, his candidature has been rejected. The learned Writ Court has gone into the matter in detail and finding the Bihar Public Service Commission to have not committed any default and having implemented the condition stipulated in the advertisement correctly refused to interfere in the matter. Once the Commission has strictly followed the condition of the advertisement not only in the case of the petitioner, but also in the case of various other persons without any

Patna High Court LPA No.11 of 2017 dt.29-06-2017 2/2 discrimination and the condition stipulated in the advertisement has been implemented strictly without any deviation from the same as this cannot be permitted, and if taking note of all these factors, the learned Writ Court has dismissed the writ petition, we find no error in the same warranting reconsideration. The appeal is dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 02.07.2017 Transmission Date