Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40393/2023bail granted

Bablu Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-21Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40393 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2021 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== BABLU MANJHI Son of Dashrath Manjhi @ Dasrath Paswan Resident of village - Dighi Chirand, P.S. - Doriganj, Distt. - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-07-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

3. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 256 of 2021 dated 26.09.2021 registered for the offences u/s 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants boarded on two motorcycles stopped the informant and took away Rs. 150 /- in cash, a mobile phone and his motorcycle forcibly.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40393 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 2/2

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioners is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got five other criminal cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 20.09.2022.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran, Chapra in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 256 of 2021.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T