Gulab Kewat And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29807 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -87 Year- 2014 Thana -LAKHISARAI District- LAKHISARAI ======================================================

1. Gulab Kewat Son of Sadhu Saran Kewat,

2. Chandrika Kewat Son of Sahu Saran Kewat

3. Sunil Kewat @ Sunil Kumar Kewat Son of Chandrika Kewat

4. Santosh Kewat @ Santosh Kumar Kewat Son of Chandrika Kewat

5. Kundan Kewat @ Kandan Kumar Son of Gulab Kewat

6. Sadhu Saran Kewa Son of Gulabi Kewat All Village of Charokhar, P.S.-Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jainendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.N. Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03/ 03-02-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against petitioners Gulab Kewat and Chandrika Kewat that they tried to throttled the son of the informant by putting towel around his neck, thereafter petitioners Kundan Kewat, Sunil Kewat, Santosh Kewat and Sadhusaran Kewat assaulted with knife. The accused persons assaulted the son of the informant since he used to talk with the daughter of Gulab Kewat.

It is submitted by learned counsel for

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29807 of 2014 (03) dt.03-02-2015 2/2 the petitioners that the petitioners' side lodged Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 86 of 2014 under Sections 354A and 354B of the Indian Penal Code against the informant and in order to save his skin from the said case the present case has been subsequently lodged.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the corresponding to the accusation the injuries have been found.

Considering the fact that there is specific accusation against the petitioners of making assault to the son of the informant, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 87 of 2014 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. Let the learned court below consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners without being prejudiced by the order this Court.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T