← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11076/2016bail granted

Soni Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2016-04-25Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11076 of 2016 (2) dt.25-04-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11076 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2015 Thana -SIGORI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Soni Khatoon Daughter of Kamru Jama Resident of Village Makhdum Chak PO Janpur PS sigori District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rounak Kumar Singh "Pankaj" For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 307, 324, 325, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x)(xiv) of SC/ST Act. It is alleged by the informant (Shanti Devi) that on 22.3.2015 at about 11 A.M. she had sat her door. In the meantime Soni Khatoon entered into her house, abused and assaulted her.. When the son (Mithilesh Kumar) of the informant came to rescue his mother, he was also assaulted by the accused persons by means of lathi, danda and leg. In the meantime Raju Alam took out knife and inflicted the knife blow to Mithilesh Kumar with intention to kill. It is also alleged that Soni Khatoon took out Rs. 500/- from the pocket of the informant. Accused persons used to utter that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11076 of 2016 (2) dt.25-04-2016 they should not allow a single member of Pasi to remain there and they will kill them.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. It is a case and counter case between the parties. From perusal of injury report it appears that the nature of injury is simple, hence no offence under Section 307 IPC is made out. So far offence u/s SC/ST Act is concerned, same is not attracted in the present case.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Shyamal Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur in Sigori P.S.Case No. 26 of 2015 ,subject to the conditions as laid down u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Sudhir Singh, J) singh/- U T