← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9866/2022withdrawn

Madan Mohan Sah v. The Union Of India

2024-08-06Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9866 of 2022 ====================================================== Madan Mohan Sah Son of Satyadev Sah Resident of village- Baraistamrar, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi.

2.

The State of Bihar through the Addl. Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Chairperson, National Highway Authority of India, New Delhi. 4.

The Addl. Chief Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Regional Officer, NHAI, Bihar, Patna.

6.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Kishanganj. 7.

The Additional Collector-cum-Chairman of Six Men Committee, Kishanganj.

8.

The District Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Member of Six Men Committee, Kishanganj.

9.

The Deputy Collector (Land Reforms)-cum-Member of Six Men Committee, Kishanganj.

10.

The District Sub-Registrar-cum-Member of Six Men Committee, Kishanganj.

11.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad Kishanganj-cum-Member of Six Men Committee, Kishanganj.

12.

The Project Director, NHAI, Purnia-cum-Member of Six Men Committee, Kishanganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Additional Solicitor General For the NHAI :

Mrs. Soni Shrivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2024 Heard Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. Soni Shrivastava, learned counsel for the NHAI and learned counsel for the State.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9866 of 2022(2) dt.06-08-2024 2/2

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) priyanka/- U