Patna High CourtL.P.A/933/2016dismissed

Mohan Prasad Rajbhar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-07Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.933 of 2016 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12591 of 2014 =========================================================== Mohan Prasad Rajbhar, son of Sri Birjanand Rajbhar, Up-Pramukh, Prakhand Panchayat Samiti, Mairwa, Distt. Siwan.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar,Patna.

3. The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Secretary, Bihar State Election Commission, Patna

5. The BDO Cum Executive Officer, Prakhand Panchayat Samiti, Mairwan, DisttSiwan

6. Nasrullah Ansari

7. Arun Kumar Sah

8. Manki Devi

9. Santosh Kumar Rai

10. Girja Devi

11. Ramrup Yadav

12. Vijay Sah

13. Janpat Raj

14. Sriram Yadav

15. Sri Krishna Prasad

16. Anirudh Sah

17. Renna Devi

18. Smt. Tara Devi

19. Vimla Devi

20. Ajendra Singh

21. Dinanath Bin

22. Kasim Alam

23. Kunti Devi

24. Noor Nisa

25. Tarawati Devi All are members of Prakhand Panchayat Samiti, Mairwan, Disrict- Siwan through the Executive Officer-cum- B.D.O., Mairwan, District- Siwan.

26. Hareram Gupta, son of Sri Shiv Nath Sah, Presently Pramukh of Block Panchayat Samiti, Mairwan, P.O. and P.S. Mairwan, District- Siwan. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Appellant/s : None. For the State Election Commission : Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Advocate. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate.

===========================================================

Patna High Court LPA No.933 of 2016 dt.07-03-2017 2/2 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 07-03-2017 Present none for the appellant.

Learned counsel for the State Election Commission submits that the present Letters Patent Appeal is rendered infructuous on account of the fact that the fresh elections for Pramukh of Panchayat Samiti have been conducted in the year 2016. In view of the said fact, the present Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed having been rendered infructuous. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Mishra/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 09.03.2017 Transmission Date