Arjun Singh Kushwaha @ Arjun Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36492 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2019 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== Arjun Singh Kushwaha @ Arjun Singh, Male, age about 25 years Son of Late Ramashray Kushwaha @ Ram Ashray Singh @ Ramashray Resident of Village- Chunni, P.S.- Buxar (Muffasil), District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Ramchandra Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2019 in connection with Buxar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 50 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and even on bare perusal of the first information report, it appears that specific allegation of firing is upon others not named co-accused. The petitioner is named in the FIR but no overt act whatsoever has been alleged against him nor he is alleged to have been carrying any arms. The petitioner is an accused in one prior case of different nature.
4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Buxar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 50 of 2019, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36492 of 2019(2) dt.13-06-2019 2/2 petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner will be well represented in court on each and every date during trial except as and when directed by the learned court to be physically present and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, her bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make herself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Vikash Jain, J) BT/- U T