Gorakh Nath Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8832 of 2026 ====================================================== Gorakh Nath Ram Son of Bishnu Prasad Ram Resident of MohallaMusafirganj, Buxar, P.S. Buxar Town, District Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary SC/ST and B.C. and Minority welfare Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Director Schedule cast and Schedule Tribes and Backward Class Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, Buxar, District- Buxar. 4.
The District Welfare Officer, Buxar, District Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravi Shankar Pathak, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Vikramadit, AC to SC-22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:
"(i) For direction to the respondent authorities to appoint the petitioner on regular basis as per his earlier Service and also as per term of settlement between Welfare Officer Buxar and employees and regularize the Service of the petitioner as per Government Scheme.
(ii) For direction to respondent authorities to pay the entire admitted dues of petitioner for his daily wages salary from October 2016 till date.
(iii) For any other relief/reliefs for which
Patna High Court CWJC No.8832 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/2 petitioner shall be found entitled under the fact and circumstances of the case under principle of equitable justice."
3. The matter relates to regularization. The case of petitioner is that he has been appointed as Night Guard in Jannayak Karpuri Thakur E.B.C. Welfare Hostel run by Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and Welfare Department, Government of Bihar. Keeping in view the prayer and the recent judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported in Bholanath vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. reported in 2026 INSC 99.
4. The petitioner will file a fresh representation stating out his claim and respondent No.2 is directed to take a decision in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court referred herein before within a period of six weeks.
5. It goes without saying that while taking a decision, petitioner or his legal representative be given a hearing.
6. This writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid direction.
(Ranjan Kumar Jha, J) Rishabh, Atul/- U