M/S. Secure Meters Limited v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.757 of 2017 =========================================================== M/s. Secure Meters Limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies Act, 1956, having its registered and head office at 'E' Class, Pratap Nagar Industrial Area, Udaipur- 313003, Rajasthan and its Regional Office at Infinity Benchmark Tower, 9th Floor, Office-2, Plot No.G1, Block- EP&GP, Sector-V, Salt Lake, Kolkata- 700091, through its Authorized Representative, Ajay Kumar Singh, son of Late Devendra Prasad Singh, resident of Salimpur Arahara, Kadamkuan, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Patna- 800003. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director.
2. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
3. The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, through its Managing Director.
4. The Managing Director, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
5. The Chief Engineer (Stores & Purchase), North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suraj Samdarshi For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-01-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation of the petitioner is pending before the respondent no.2. Let the respondent no.2 decide the representation of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.757 of 2017 dt.19-01-2017 petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
This Court has not given any opinion on the merit of the case and the respondent no.2 has to decide the case on merit in accordance with law.
With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 20.01.2017 Transmission Date