Kailash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47499 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2021 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Kailash Yadav Son Of Raghuni Yadav Resident Of Village - Chak Hussaini, Police Station - Mansi, District - Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act.

When the informant was on duty, he heard firing sound from eastern side and informed it to the SHO and went there. On seeing the police, accused persons started running away. Some people were arrested and some of them including the petitioner fled away from the place of occurrence. One live cartridge and five empty cartridges were recovered from the place of occurrence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47499 of 2021(2) dt.25-04-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mansi P.S. case no. 149 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T