Nunu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11342 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2015 Thana -NAYAGAON District- SARAN ======================================================

1. NUNU PASWAN son of Late Pahru Paswan, Resident of VillageSinghalpur Diyara, PS- Nayagaon, District- Saran (Chapra). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Rai For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. C.Jawahar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-04-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 58 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner assaulted the informant with Fasli in his abdomen with an intention to kill him resulting intestine came out.

Submission is of false implication and that there was no motive to commit the crime, the occurrence has taken place due to grazing of crops by goat, in supplementary injury report, the injury has been found grievous and accordingly,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11342 of 2016 (3) dt.28-04-2016 2/2 charge-sheet has been submitted.

The learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner has caused injury on the vital part of the informant with an intention to kill him. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail after completion of nine months in custody from the date of his remand on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VIth, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 58 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) ajaypd./- U T