← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4924/2015bail granted

Sunil Sao And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4924 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Sunil Sao Son of Rajendra Prasad

2. Sanjay Sao

3. Pankaj Sao Both are sons of Late Satyanarayan Sao

4. Vijay Sao Son of Panda Sao

5. Raju Sao S/O Late Chandeshwar Sao

6. Rauki Sao S/O Late Chandeshwar Sao

7. Dhamendra Sao S/O Late Chandeshwar Sao

8. Vinay Sao

9. Vikas Sao Both are sons of Vinod Sao

10. Rohan Sao S/O Late Shankar Sao

11. Ravi Sao Son of Rohan Sao

12. Suraj Sao Son of Kishori Sao

13. Baiju Sao Son of Kishori Sao

14. Amarnath Sao Son of Kishori Sao All are Resident of Vill- Kurtha, P.S- Kurtha, Distt.-Arwal .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioners, 14 in number, are apprehending their arrest in Kurtha P.S. Case No. 48/2014 registered under Section 307 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleged that while he was sitting near a temple, the accused persons demanded money for taking wine but, on refusal, the accused persons assaulted him and others. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all the allegations are false and concocted. From the side of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4924 of 2015 (2) dt.04-02-2015 2/2 petitioners, Kurtha P.S. Case No. 47/14 was registered against the informant and others. Due to land dispute, the occurrence took place as the informant has fraudulently purchased a piece of land. The informant and other injured got simple injuries as would appear from Annexure 3 series. From the side of the petitioners also, four persons were injured.

It appears that there is a case and counter-case. The informant and others got simple injuries. The occurrence took place on account of land dispute.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Shashi Kant Rai, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jehanabad in Kurtha P.S. Case No. 48/2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T