← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11320/2016bail granted

Maya Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-02Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11320 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -104 Year- 2013 Thana -NAUTAN District- SIWAN ====================================================== Maya Devi, Wife of Amarjeet Kushwaha, Resident of Village- Khalawan, Police Station- Nauthan, District- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anish Chandra(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No.104 of 2013 for the offences instituted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 332, 353, 379, 307, 427 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case, in brief, is that Guthni Police went at the resident of Amarjeet Kushwaha- husband of petitioner Maya Devi for execution of the process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. It is further alleged that an altercation took place between the police and Maya Devi together with the supporters of Amarjeet Kushwaha. It is further alleged that a mob was collected there consisting about 50-60 persons out of which 18 persons are named

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11320 of 2016 (2) dt.02-05-2016 2/2 and 30-40 persons are unknown. It is again said that on the order of petitioner Maya devi who were armed with Lathi, Danda, Sickle etc. fell upon the police party and some police personnnels have sustained injuries.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to political rivalry. Petitioner is a lady. No specific injury has been attributed against the petitioner.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No.104 of 2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) N.H./- U T