Bindeshwar Yadav And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 23402 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2011 Thana -MARAUNA District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Bindeshwar Yadav S/O Late Bachcha Yadav

2. Laleshwar Yadav S/O Late Bachcha Yadav

3. Manoj Yadav S/O Raghuni Yadav

4. Kari Yadav @ Ashok Yadav S/O Raghuni Yadav

5. Nandi Yadav S/O Late Jangal Yadav All are resident of Village- Chandragarh, P.S.- Marauna, District- Supaul .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indra Kumar Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

28-03-2016 At the very outset, Sri Pramod Mishra, learned counsel for petitioners, in presence of learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, submits that though F.I.R. was not lodged in relation to offences under the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the police as per direction of the Superintendent of Police has submitted chargesheet under such provisions also and as such, the order of cognizance is bad. However, after some argument, he makes a prayer for disposal of the present petition so that petitioners may take the pleas, which have been taken in the present petition, before the court below at appropriate stage.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23402 of 2013 (2) dt.28-03-2016 2/2 The prayer is allowed.

The petition stands disposed of with liberty, as indicated above.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T