Patna High CourtCWJC/3137/2017disposed

Hari Priya Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-07Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3137 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Hari Priya Das Daughter of Basant Kumar Das, Resident of VillageMaharajee Hata (Janta Chowk), Purnia, P.O.- Purnia, P.S.- K.Hat, DistrictPurnia. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through its Principal Secretary, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna, Bihar.

4. The District Magistrate, Purnia.

5. The District Education Officer, Purnia.

6. The Block Education Officer, Purnia.

7. The Block Development Officer, Purnia.

8. The District Program Officer, Purnia.

9. The Child Development Program Officer, Purnia.

10. The District Treasury Officer, Purnia.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Apurva Kumar For the Respondent/s : Smt. Binita Singh- Sc28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 07-03-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent State wherein stand taken by the respondent no.6 that the grievance with regard to the payment has already been redressed. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction submits that certain dues has not been cleared as yet although he admits that substantial payment has been made.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3137 of 2017 (3) dt.07-03-2018 2/2 In view of the above this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation with regard to wrong calculation as to the petitioner entitlement or in case, any claim of the petitioner has not been properly addressed by the respondent, petitioner, if so advised, may file representation along with a copy of this order within one week from today raising such grievance the respondent no.5 will decide the representation in accordance with law by a reasoned speaking order within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) AnilKrSinha/- U