Bindekh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47654 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2020 Thana- TISIAUTA District- Vaishali ====================================================== BINDEKH RAI Son of Harendra Rai Resident of village - Laxmi Narayanpur, P.S.- Tisiauta, District - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 108 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section-30(a) (b)(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The prosecution case, in short, is that 3028.14 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is alleged that 2834.64 liters wine is recovered from the truck and 193.5 litres wine is recovered from the car. The petitioner is not owner of either of the vehicles. The name of the petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47654 of 2021(2) dt.15-11-2021 2/2 transpired in this case on the basis of secret information. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cumSpecial Judge, Excise Act, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 108 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T