Anil Kumar Chaudhari @ Anil Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39863 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2024 Thana- MAHKAR District- Gaya ====================================================== Anil Kumar Chaudhari @ Anil Chaudhary SON OF LATE RAMPRASAD CHAUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BIHTA, P.S.- MAHKAR, DISTRICT- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-07-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have assaulted on head of informant by means of iron rod.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that due to land dispute between the parties, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that doctor has found the injuries
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39863 of 2024(3) dt.31-07-2024 2/2 sustained by informant to be grievous in nature.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T