← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/670/2017withdrawn

The State Of Bihar And ORS v. Navin Kumar Singh

2018-04-02Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.670 of 2017 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2832 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Joint Secretary to the Government of General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director, Land Acquisition, Bihar, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate, Supaul.

.... .... Respondents / Appellants

Versus

Navin Kumar Singh, S/o Sri Badri Narayan Singh, R/o Village - Pahsara, P.s. Naokothi, District Begusarai .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Prakritita Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. (A.P.P.) =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 02-04-2018 Taking note of the nature of order passed by the learned Writ Court and the fact that an arbitrary action of punishment has been quashed by the learned Writ Court when this Court was coming to a conclusion to conduct an enquiry into the matter of distribution of compensation for the entire period and to enquire as to how the respondent employee has been singled out and action taken against him and when we indicated that we may conduct an enquiry against all such employees who are responsible for the delay in payment of

Patna High Court LPA No.670 of 2017 dt.02-04-2018 2/2 compensation, learned counsel for the State seeks permission to withdraw this appeal.

We grant permission to withdraw the appeal with a caution to the State Government that such appeals against reasonable orders of this Court should not be filed and the State Government should be more careful in granting permission for filing LPAs to these officers. With the aforesaid, the State is permitted to withdraw the Appeal.

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 05.04.2018 Transmission Date N/A