Kunti Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39270 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2022 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
KUNTI DEVI WIFE OF KRISHNA KESHRI R/O MOHALLADHOLAKIYA GALI, P.S.- KOTWALI, DISTRICT- GAYA, BIHAR (823001) 2.
RUPA DEVI @ RUPA KESHRI WIFE OF PINTU KUMAR @ PINTU KESHRI R/O MOHALLA- DHOLAKIYA GALI, P.S.- KOTWALI, DISTRICT- GAYA, BIHAR (823001) 3.
KRISHNA KESHRI @ KRISHNA PRASAD SON OF LATE NARAYAN SAW R/O MOHALLA- DHOLAKIYA GALI, P.S.- KOTWALI, DISTRICTGAYA, BIHAR (823001) 4.
PINTU KESHRI @ PINTU KUMAR SON OF KRISHNA KESHRI R/O MOHALLA- DHOLAKIYA GALI, P.S.- KOTWALI, DISTRICT- GAYA, BIHAR (823001) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341,323,448,308/34 of the IPC.
As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that the accused persons including these petitioners and 8-10 persons armed with iron rod entered into the house of the informant and assaulted him causing injury on the head. They also injured
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39270 of 2022(2) dt.23-11-2022 2/2 daughter in law of the informant.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that due to property dispute between both the parties, a simple scuffle took place. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and no specific allegation has been labeled against them. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of the case, in the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Gaya subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) asmit/- U T