Vishal Yadav @ Sundram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36586 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2025 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Vishal Yadav @ Sundram Yadav, Son of Digvijay Prasad Yadav @ Digwijay Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village-Tamkuhawa, P.S.-Dhanha, District-West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No.173 of 2025 registered under Sections 126(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (in short 'B.N.S.').

3. As per FIR, the petitioner alleged to outrage the modesty of daughter of the informant and her friends and when same was objected by the informant, the petitioner opened fire upon him. After occurrence, petitioner fled away leaving his motorcycle, bearing Registration No.BR06CB4004, a black colour Yamaha, at spot itself.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36586 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for petitioner that the informant in fact concealed the true fact by lodging the FIR, as during the course of investigation, it transpired that the daughter of informant was in relationship with petitioner since last one and half years back from the occurrence and this fact was surfaced in paragraph-14 of the case diary. It is submitted that as the relationship was not approved by the informant, the present false case was lodged without having any cogent material. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in one more criminal case, which is related with land dispute, where he is on bail.

5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as prima facie the statement of victim suggest that she was in talking terms with petitioner since last one and half years of the occurrence, as discussed aforesaid, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36586 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 3/3 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No.173 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'CrPC')/under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short 'BNSS').

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Sanjeet/- U T