← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37185/2026bail rejected

Vijay Yadav @ Bijli Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-17Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37185 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-507 Year-2023 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Vijay Yadav @ Bijli Yadav S/O Late Nageshwar Yadav Resident of VillageArriya (Araria), P.S- Parbatta (Maraiya), District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-07-2026 Heard Mr. Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-B)A, 26(i)(ii)(iii) and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, two country made pistols, five live cartridges, 16 bullets and other articles were recovered from house of co-accused Kailu Sharma and three persons were apprehended. One of the apprehended co-accused, namely Kailaash Sharma, disclosed the name of this petitioner and stated that the weapons are given by this petitioner and thereafter, he supplies them forward. Petitioner has got seven

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37185 of 2026(2) dt.17-07-2026 2/2 criminal antecedents out of which four are of similar nature.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, recovery of illegal arms and ammunition and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is rejected.

5. However, considering the fact that petitioner is in custody since 12.02.2026, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same, preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T