Patna High CourtCWJC/2950/2015dismissed

Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-23Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2950 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Arvind Kumar Son of Sri Sitaram Singh, Resident of Village - Nimi, P.O. - Sheikhpur Sarai, District - Sheikhpura (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

3. The Director (Higher Education), Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar,New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

4. The Bihar Public Service Commission, Nawahar Lal Nehru Marg (Bailey Road), Patna through its Chairman.

5. The Chairman, the Bihar Public Service Commission, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg (Bailey Road), Patna.

6. The Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, (Bailey Road), Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Krishna Kumar,AC to GP26 For B.P.S.C. : Mr. Sanjay Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 23-02-2015 The petitioner wants a direction upon the respondentauthorities to insert a clause in the advertisement issued by B.P.S.C. to fill up the post of Assistant Professor by making the Bihar eligibility test passed candidates equivalent to S.L.E.T and S.E.T.

It is a speculative kind of writ application, specially when petitioner's application has been filed, but nothing tangible by way

Patna High Court CWJC No.2950 of 2015 (2) dt.23-02-2015 2 / 2 of exercise has been done because of series of litigation of one kind or the other. Nothing is required to be expressed by this Court at this stage. When the authorities start scrutinizing the applications in terms of the eligibility, may be there could be a case to consider. Nothing is required to be said on the basis of presumption or anticipation of the petitioner. The writ application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) B.Roy/- U