Rajeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2813 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21450 of 2011 ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar son of Sri Birendra Das resident of village Naya Gaon P.S. Parbatta, District Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Sri Deepak Kumar the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
Sri Gupteshwar Pandey, The D.G. of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.
Garima Mallik, The Chairman Constable Selection Board, Patna. 4.
Hari Kishore Rai, Chairman Constable Selection Board, Bhojpur District. 5.
Satyaveer Singh, Chairman Constable Selection Board, Rohtas District. 6.
G. Mangla The Chairman Constable Selection Board, Munger District. 7.
R. Mishra, Chairman Constable Selection Board, Gaya District Gaya. 8.
N.C. Jha, Chairman Constable Selection Board, Saran District. 9.
Jitendra Kumar, Chairman, Constable Selection Board, B.M.P. 5 Patna. 10.
Vinay Tiwary, Chairman, Constable Selection Board, B.M.P. 10 Patna. 11.
Yogendra Kumar, Chairman, Constable Selection Board, B.M.P. 20 Dumraon.
12.
Satya Prakash, Chairman, Constable Selection Board, Muzaffarpur District. 13.
Rajiv Ranjan, Chairman, Constable Selection Board, Bagaha Dist. 14.
Jaykant Kant, Chairman, Constable Selection Board, Motihari District. 15.
Santosh Kumar, The Chairman, Constable Selection Board, Nawada. 16.
Deepak Barnawal, Chairman, Constable Selection Board, Aurangabad District.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ebrahim Kabir, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 31-07-2023 Heard the parties.
The present petition has been preferred for compliance of the order dated 19.12.2011 passed in CWJC No.
Patna High Court MJC No.2813 of 2018(4) dt.31-07-2023 2/2 21450 of 2011.
From the averment made, it is clear that no contempt is made out.
The MJC No. 2813 of 2018 stands dismissed.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/- U