Brij Nandan Singh And ANR v. Shanti Devi And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12159 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Brij Nandan Singh, Son of Late Bhuneshwar Singh Resident of Village - Lagma, P.S. and District - Jamui (Bihar) At Present Residing At Village - Dhandh, P.S./District - Jamui (Bihar).
2. Bhimsen Singh Son Of Late Ramdeo Singh Resident Of Village - Lagma, P.S./District - Jamui (Bihar).
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. Shanti Devi, Wife Of Ram Lakhan Keshri Resident Of Purani Bazar, P.O./P.S./District - Jamui.
2. Radha Devi Wife Of Ramchandra Keshri Resident Of Purani Bazar, P.O./P.S./District - Jamui
3. Ram Lakhan Keshri, Son Of Late Nand Kishore Chaudhary Resident Of Purani Bazar, P.O./P.S./District - Jamui
4. Shri Kant Singh, Son Of Late Hari Singh Resident Of Village - Lagma, P.S./District - Jamui (Bihar)
5. Sanjay Singh, Son Of Late Hari Singh Resident Of Village - Lagma, P.S./District - Jamui (Bihar)
6. Niraj Singh Son Of Late Hari Singh Resident Of Village - Lagma, P.S./District - Jamui (Bihar)
7. Sanjib Singh, Son Of Late Hari Singh Resident Of Village - Lagma, P.S./District - Jamui (Bihar)
8. Borahan Singh, Alias Bachan Singh Son Of Late Mani Singh Resident Of Village - Lagma, P.S./District - Jamui (Bihar)
9. Biko Alias Bikas Singh, Son Of Late Mani Singh Resident Of Village - Lagma, P.S./District - Jamui (Bihar) .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2016 Heard.
This application has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 11.02.2013 passed in T.S. No. 120 of 2012, whereunder the Sub-Judge-I, Jamui rejected the plaint of the plaintiff/petitioner under Order VII, Rule 11(c) of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.12159 of 2013 (2) dt.28-09-2016 2/2 C.P.C. arriving at a conclusion in the grave of the declaring the title plaintiff wants to cancel the sale deed executed on 16.11.1968. On perusal of the impugned order, I find no illegality to interfere with the same in extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and, accordingly, the present application is dismissed.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U