← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1898/2025consigned

Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police Namely Vinay Kumar

2025-12-05Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1898 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6827 of 2023 ====================================================== Sonu Kumar Son of Sri Bindeshwar Mahto, Resident of Village- Gonhar Nawada, P.O.- Kharaj Jitwarpur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Samastipur, Bihar848134. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police namely Vinay Kumar Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Vinay Kumar, The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Amit Lodha, The Additional Director General of Police, (Budget, Appeal and Welfare), Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Jitendra Singh Gangwar, The Inspector General of Police, namely Mithila Region, Darbhanga.

5.

Sri Ashok Mishra, The Superintendent of Police, namely Samastipur. 6.

Sri K.K. Diwakar, The Deputy Superintendent Police, Samastipur. 7.

The Bihar Police Subordinate Service Commission, through the Secretary namely Pankaj Sinha, Santosh Mansion, B Block Near RPS Law College, Raghunathpur, Danapur, Patna-801503.

8.

Sri Pankaj Sinha, The Secretary, Bihar Police Subordinate Service Commission, Santosh Mansion, B Block Near RPS Law College, Raghunathpur, Danapur, Patna-801503.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Kaushik, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

AC to SC 8 For the BPSSC :

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate Mr. Nishant Kr. Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-12-2025 Heard Mr. Kumar Kaushik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; learned AC to SC 8 for the State and Mr. Sanjay Pandey along with Mr. Nishant Kr. Jha, learned counsel for the BPSSC.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court MJC No.1898 of 2025(4) dt.05-12-2025 2/2 opposite parties submitted that the order under contempt has been complied.

3. The present contempt petition, accordingly, stands consigned.

4. However, the petitioner if still aggrieved in any manner, he would at be liberty to avail appropriate remedy. (Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U