Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31087/2014bail granted

Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-01-20Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31087 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -32 Year- 2014 Thana -JAKKANPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar, Son of Late Naresh Prasad, resident of mohalla- West Jaiprakash Nagar, P.S.- Jakkanpur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mrs. Babita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered in connection with Jakkanpur P.S. Case No.32 of 2014.

3. It is submitted that the accusations are general and omnibus in nature and in any event, any thrust of accusations is against the husband of the informant who has since been released on bail by this Court.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let petitioner (Mukesh Kumar) be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31087 of 2014 (2) dt.20-01-2015 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Praveen Kumar Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna in connection with Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U T