Jivan Prakash @ Jivan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37210 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2025 Thana- BIHRA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Jivan Prakash @ Jivan Ram S/o Ravindra Ram R/o Village - Piprahi, P.S - Mathahi, District - Madhepura .. ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subesh Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Shastri, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No.12 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1), 126(2), 352 & 3(5) of the BNS and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown miscreants intercepted the bike of the informant and assaulted him with butt of country made pistol.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, one Deepak @ Kalia was arrested and he disclosed the name of the petitioner. It has been submitted that save and except the confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner. It has further been submitted that thought the petitioner is having criminal antecedent

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37210 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/2 of 12 cases, it will transpire that most of the cases are of the year 2025 whereas the petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2025. It has been submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in most of the cases by police after being arrested in this case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. It has been submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of dozen of cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial; shall remain physicall present on each and every date in the learned trial court, whenever required and shall also mark his weekly attendance at Pipra P.S.

7. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Saharsa in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No.12 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T