Rinki @ Rinki Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18271 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -163 Year- 2014 Thana -PURNEA SADAR District- PURNIA ======================================================
1. Rinki @ Rinki Devi Wife of Manjoor Alam, R/o Village- Katihar More, Khuskibag, P.S.- Sadar, District- Purnea.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-04-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 372, 373, 376, 366(A), 120B of the Indian Penal Code, under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of Immoral Traffic Act, under Section 23 of Juvenile Justice Act and under Section 4 of POCSO Act. The prosecution case is that the informant, Manoj Kumar, being S.D.O., Purnea, Sadar, on secret information about flesh trade, submitted a report to S.H.O., Sadar Purnea consequently a raid was laid and 14 persons were apprehended. Neighbouring persons of the place suggested the names of others including the petitioner.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18271 of 2016 (2) dt.28-04-2016 2/2 that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot. On conclusion of investigation the petitioner was not sent up for trial but differing with the final form, order of cognizance has been passed. The accused persons, who have been apprehended from the spot, have been granted anticipatory bail by coordinate benches of this court in Cr. Misc. No. 35977 of 2014 and Cr. Misc. No. 35995 of 2014. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is on bail in Sadar P.S. case No. 463 of 2013 though statement to that effect has not been made in the bail petition.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Purnea in connection with Suppl. Special Case No. 11 of 2014 arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No. 163 of 2014 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.