Kapil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5620 of 2017 =========================================================== Kapil Kumar, Son of Kameshwar Turi, resident of village - Sansarpur, P.S. Gidhaur, District - Jamui.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna
3. The Director Primary Education, Bihar, Patna
4. The District Magistrate, Jamui
5. The District Education Officer, Jamui
6. The District Programme Officer ( Primary Education & District Sarva Siksha Abhiyan ), Jamui
7. The Block Education officer, Gidhaur, Jamui
8. The Head Master Primary School, Sansarpur, P.O. & P.S. Gidhaur, District - Jamui .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadav, GP- 23. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 31-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following relief:
"That this is an application for issuance of writ in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondents to allow the petitioner to mark his attendance, further to direct the respondents to pay his arrears of his due Honrarium since 01.02.2010 to till the date of payment."
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be disposed off with liberty
Patna High Court CWJC No.5620 of 2017 dt.31-08-2017 2/2 to the petitioner to move before the respondent no. 6, in the matter.
4. Learned counsel for the State does not oppose.
5. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty aforesaid.
6. If the petitioner moves before the respondent no. 6 within four weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed off, in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within two months from the date of filing of such representation.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U