Simanti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar, Secretary Of Social Welfair Department,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14691 of 2021 ====================================================== Simanti Kumari W/o Akhilesh Prasad Resident of Village - Ramdohar Tola Milki, P.S. - Maigar, P.S. - Dumaria, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, Secretary of Social Welfair Department, Bihar at Patna. 2.

The Director of Human Resources, Bihar at Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate Gaya Bihar.

4.

The District Program Officer Gaya Bihar.

5.

The Child Development Officer Dumaria Gaya Bihar. 6.

Puja Kumari w/o Rajiv Kumar Resident of Village - Ramdohar Tola Milki, P.S. - Malgar, P.S. -Dumaria, District- Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Smt. Kumari Amrita (Gp3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That the present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for issuance a writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash the order dated 1202- 20 passed by respondents no-3 in Aganbari appeal no-67 of 2019 by which respondent no-3 without going to merits of case dismissed on limitation. As well as order dated 15-09-18 passed by respondents no-4 In Aganwarl case no.- 193 of 2018 by which the claim of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.14691 of 2021(2) dt.18-01-2024 2/2 petitioner not consider by the respondents no-4 and dismissed her case without examine the facts and circumstances of the case and/or may be pass other relief which the petitioner is entitled to and/or may be pass other and further order which the petitioner is entitled to. (Order is annexed here with and marked as annexure-1)"

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U