← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9215/2018disposed

Sri Baiju Prasad Singh v. The B. R. A. Bihar University Through The Its Registrar And ORS

2018-08-14Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9215 of 2018 =========================================================== Sri Baiju Prasad Singh S/o late Siya Sharan Singh Resident of Buddha Colony, Adalbari, Hajipur Near Central Public School, P.S. - Hajipur, District - Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The B. R. A. Bihar University through the Registrar having office at University Campus, Muzaffarpur.

2. The Vice-Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

3. The Finance Officer, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

4. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sri Niwas Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Singh, Advocate For the University :

Mr. Zaki Haider, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and B.R.A. Bihar University (hereinafter referred to as the 'University').

2. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:

"That this is an application for issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction to Command the respondents to pay the retiral benefits and other legitimate claims including monthly medical allowance alongwith 18% interest per annum from the due date of payment and also the Cost of this proceeding."

Patna High Court CWJC No.9215 of 2018 dt.14-08-2018 2/2

3. From the stand taken in the counter affidavit, it transpires that all admitted retiral benefits have been paid. However, with regard to pre-retiral dues, the stand is that within three months, the same shall also be paid. The same is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. Having regard to the fact that admitted retiral benefits have been paid, the writ petition stands disposed off with the observation that the University shall pay the remaining dues of the petitioner, as per the stand taken in the counter affidavit. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U