Shatrudhan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36028 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2019 Thana- DUMRA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== SHATRUDHAN KUMAR Son of Binod Sah Resident of village - Dhanushi, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District - Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, on 01.09.2019, when informant was returning home, 6 unknown miscreants intercepted him and on the point of pistol and knife snatched his vehicle, mobile, cash and other articles and fled away.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused person. Except confessional statement there is no material on record to show the complicity of this petitioner in the alleged occurrence. No
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36028 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 2/2 looted article has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner and till date he has not been put on T.I. parade. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation, fact that no incriminating article has been recovered from possession of this petitioner and period of custody, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 338 of 2019. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T