← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38129/2022allowed

Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-29Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38129 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2020 Thana- KUDHNI District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Rai S/O Hriday Narayan Rai Resident Of VillageSango, P.S.- Karanda, District- Ghazipur (Uttar Pradesh). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is said to have abducted the daughter of the informant for the purpose of the marriage. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that petitioner had married with the victim

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38129 of 2022(2) dt.29-09-2022 2/2 and marriage certificate is enclosed at Annexure-2 of the bail application. He further submitted that after marriage petitioner has got one child born out of the wedlock and certificate of the children is enclosed in annexure-3 of the bail application. He submits that marriage was solemnized on 07.01.2022 and F.I.R. lodged on 09.01.2022. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kudhani (Kudhuni) P.S. Case No. 01 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T