← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47114/2021bail rejected

Sunil Uraon @ Sunil Urawn v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-04Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47114 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2020 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== SUNIL URAON @ SUNIL URAWN Son of Sharmaji Urawn Resident of Village- Birpur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 04-04-2022 Heard the parties.

The petitioner has preferred this application in a case registered under sections..

as per the prosecution case, the informant states that the five named accused persons including the petitioner herein took away his minor daughter.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The age of the girl was medical ..and she was found to be 19-20 years. The statement under section 164 Cr.PC is a tutored statement. The petitioner is in custody since 15.1.2021 and has no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case.

The application for bail is opposed by learned counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47114 of 2021(3) dt.04-04-2022 2/2 for the State who submits that as per the certificate issued by the school, the daughter of the informant is a minor. Further the victim has supported the prosecution case against the petitioner in her statement under section 161 Cr.P.C as also under section 164 Cr.PC.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, the contents of the material that has transpired in course of investigation wherein the victim has supported the direct allegation against this petitioner, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U