Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35601 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-457 Year-2024 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Rahul Kumar S/o Subhash Singh @ Rajkishor Singh @ Ram Kishor Singh R/o Village- Parariya, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran 2.

Subhash Singh @ Rajkishor Singh @ Ram Kishor Singh S/o Late Ramjee Singh R/o Village- Parariya, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Adya Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2025 Heard Mr. Ram Adya Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 457 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 05.12.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act, 2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they have assaulted to the son of the informant due to which he received grievous injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35601 of 2025(2) dt.16-06-2025 2/3 the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. It appears from the F.I.R. itself that the date of occurrence as alleged in the F.I.R. is 25.11.2024 but the present F.I.R. was instituted on 05.12.2024 after delay of about ten days without giving any explanation of delay and there is case and counter case between the parties.

5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioners that they have assaulted to the son of the informant and he has received injuries but the injury report of the injured person suggests that the injury is grievous in nature and apart from that the petitioners carries three more cases other than the present one.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the injury inflicted upon the injured person is grievous in nature, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 457 of 2024

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35601 of 2025(2) dt.16-06-2025 3/3 pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka (East Champaran).

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T