Shatrudhan Yadav @ Pali v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40422 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-619 Year-2024 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Shatrudhan Yadav @ Pali S/o Late Gopal Rai @ Gopal Prasad R/o VillageReganiya Bag, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Gopal Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 619 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant being a police personnel has alleged that on 08.10.2024, he got information that a quarrel and firing had taken place in the village Reganiya. For the verification of the same, when police searched the house of the Shatrudhan Yadav, one country made pistol and one mis-fired cartridge were recovered from there.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him in the F.I.R. The entire allegation against the petitioner is false, fabricated, baseless and there is not even an
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40422 of 2025(2) dt.15-07-2025 2/2 iota of truth in it. The present case has been lodged with an intention to harass the petitioner and to tarnish his image in the society. Lastly, he prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.
6. From perusal of F.I.R., it appears that there is direct allegation against the petitioner that country made pistol along with mis-fired cartridge have been recovered beneath the bed inside his house on the alleged date of occurrence. As per para 3 of the bail petition the petitioner has also one criminal antecedent. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court is not inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T