← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3391/2018disposed

Rajendra Pandit v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2022-08-30Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3391 of 2018 ====================================================== Rajendra Pandit Son of late Kapildeo Pandit Resident of Village- Karhari, Police Station- Bhagwanpur in the district of Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Vaishali. 5.

The Deputy Development Commission, Vaishali.

6.

The Circle Officer, Bhagwanpur, Anchal in the district of Vaishali. 7.

The Gram Panchayat, Karhari Under Bhagwanpur Block through its Mukhiya.

8.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Karhari Under Bhagwanpur Block in the district of Vaishali.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md.Khurshid Alam -Aag12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 30-08-2022 In pursuance to the earlier order of this Court dated 19.07.2022, a counter affidavit has been filed by the District Magistrate, Vaishali which is taken on record. It has been submitted in the said counter affidavit that the encroachment made over the land of the petitioner has been successfully removed on 26.07.2022 and in confirmation of the same, the uncle of the petitioner Sri Sita Ram Pandit has also put his signature, hence, it appears that nothing survives for further

Patna High Court CWJC No.3391 of 2018(4) dt.30-08-2022 2/2 consideration in the present case.

At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to agitate the subsisting grievance of the petitioner, if any, in accordance with law. Liberty so sought, is granted. The writ petition stands disposed off, however with the aforesaid liberty.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U