← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35256/2025bail granted

Bishal Kumar @ Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-08Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35256 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2024 Thana- DARPA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Bishal Kumar @ Vishal Kumar S/o Naresh Patel @ Naresh Raut R/o VillageGamhariya Kala, P.S.- Darpa, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rahul Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned c APP for the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4), 305, 317(2), 111 of the BNSS Act.

3. The allegation in the FIR is that a theft was committed in the shop of the informant and one person Pradeep Kumar was apprehended upon chase, who disclose the names of other six accused persons including the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case only on account of the fact that the apprehended accused Pradeep Kumar has disclosed his name as one of the culprit of the crime. There is no other material collected against him during the entire course

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35256 of 2025(3) dt.08-07-2025 2/2 of investigation. Further, it would appear that besides the fact that there has been recovery from Pradeep Kumar and the second seizure list would go to show that there is some recovery of the stolen articles made from the shop of one Deepak Kumar.

5. The learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the fact that there is no recovery from the house of the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedent, I am inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of four weeks from today the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/ successor court in Darpa P.S. Case No. 191 of 2024 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) N.K/- U T