Patna High CourtL.P.A/463/2018dismissed

Sarita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-09The Chief Justice-,Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.463 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13464 of 2017 ====================================================== Sarita Kumari, Wife of Sri Anand Raj, Resident of Village- Manjam, Ward No. 12, P.O.- Manjam Patti, Barhara Kothi, Police Station- Banmankhi, District- Purnea(Bihar).

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Deputy Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

5. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saharsa.

6. The District Education Officer, Saharsa.

7. The District Education Officer (Establishment), Saharsa.

8. The District Education Officer, Madhepura.

9. The District Project Officer, (Establishment) Madhepura.

10. The District Education Officer (Establishment), Supaul.

11. The Block Education Extension Officer, Ghailadh, Purnea. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Ratan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey -AAG15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 09-01-2019 I.A. No.2695 of 2018 Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, we are satisfied that sufficient ground has been made out to condone the delay. Delay condonation application is allowed and the appeal shall be treated to be within time.

Patna High Court LPA No.463 of 2018 dt.09-01-2019 2/2 L.P.A. No.463 of 2018 Learned counsel for the appellant has very fairly invited the attention of the Court to the judgement dated 16th July, 2018 in L.P.A. No.485 of 2018. The matter stands covered by the aforesaid pronouncement with which we do not find any reason to differ. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) ( Anjana Mishra, J) Nasimul/K.C.Jha AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 10-01-2019 Transmission Date N/A