Dinanath Yadav @ Dinnath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48199 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-650 Year-2020 Thana- BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== DINANATH YADAV @ DINNATH YADAV S/o- LATE PRASAD YADAV Resident of Village- Mahartha, P.S.- Nuon, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Rekha Kumari Daughter of Sri Vijay Yadav Resident of Village- Majharhi, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in which cognizance has been taken under sections 498(A) and 354 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture and outraging the modesty of the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48199 of 2021(2) dt.29-10-2021 2/2 tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is father-in-law of the victim. He has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. F.C. Bhabua, Kaimur in connection with Complaint Case No. 650/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T